Isometric gold robotic hand holding an object

Model it with the exceptions in

Adjust the seven inputs below to match your own process. The two that matter are the ones nobody else asks for: how often the agent is right, and how long a person takes to clean up when it is not.

Your numbers
Honest payback
3.5 months
$1,290 saved per month, after exceptions
What the other calculators leave outAt 92% accuracy, 40 tasks a month still reach a human, and they take longer than the original job because someone is checking the agent. That is $280 a month, and $3,360 off the first-year headline.
Typical pitch2.9 months$14,340
With exceptions priced in3.5 months$10,980
Payback and net position after twelve months.

Why the exception line changes the recommendation

A miss costs more than a skip

A task the agent gets wrong is not the same cost as one it never touched. Someone now reads the attempt, decides it is wrong, and redoes it.

A miss costs more than a skip

A task the agent gets wrong is not the same cost as one it never touched. Someone now reads the attempt, decides it is wrong, and redoes it.

Treat accuracy as a budget

Ninety two percent sounds like a rounding error until it is multiplied by volume. On 500 tasks a month, that is forty escalations.

Treat accuracy as a budget

Ninety two percent sounds like a rounding error until it is multiplied by volume. On 500 tasks a month, that is forty escalations.

Honest numbers survive the board

A payback figure that holds up when finance tests it is worth more than a larger one that collapses in the second meeting.

Honest numbers survive the board

A payback figure that holds up when finance tests it is worth more than a larger one that collapses in the second meeting.

Want this run on your real process?

Send us one workflow and we will estimate its accuracy band before anything is agreed.

Request an introduction

Request an introduction

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.